Volume 44 Number 4

Diabetic feet with plantar thermal burn wounds – a patient optimisation and preservative care approach

Hiske Smart, Frans J Cronje

Keywords Diabetes, Infection, thermal burns, neuropathy, preservative care.

For referencing Smart H, Cronje FJ. Diabetic feet with plantar thermal burn wounds – a patient optimisation and preservative care approach. WCET® Journal 2024;44(4):24-27.

DOI 10.33235/wcet.44.4.24-27

PDF

Author(s)

References

中文

Introduction

All wounds tell a story. This one began on the western Arabian Peninsula and involved a patient who had just returned from attending the 2024 Hajj pilgrimage in Mecca. This time of year (called ‘Eid’) clocked record-breaking temperatures, with extensive news coverage on the subsequent impact on the morbidity and mortality of the pilgrims.1

While taking part, barefoot, in the midday prayers, our 40-year-old patient – with a history of >10 years of non-insulin-dependent diabetes – sustained full-thickness burns on the plantar surface of his right foot and partial-deep thickness burns to the other.2 The neuropathic insensitivity of his feet offered no protective warning of the thermal insult.3  A day later, his wife, who had accompanied him, noticed sacks with fluid on the bottom of his feet – still with no pain. He completed the full Hajj as planned and then returned to his residence. The blisters were broken to allow him to wear shoes for his return.

Patient assessment

At home, the patient developed a severe wound infection in his right foot within two days, prompting him to seek medical attention at a primary care facility. Initial treatment included systemic oral antibiotics and topical ointment applied to both soles of his feet. He was promptly referred to our Advanced Wound Care and Baromedicine Department and was evaluated the following day. By this time, his burn wounds were four days old, and he was experiencing persistent pain in his right foot, rated at 4-5 on a Visual Analogue Scale.

Upon initial assessment, the right foot presented with significant clinical signs of deep wound infection. A 6°F temperature differential was noted between the right foot and both the left foot and right upper leg. The feet also exhibited circumferential midfoot swelling, erythema extending from the base of the toes to the midfoot, and a foul-smelling exudate—clear indicators of a deep wound infection compounded by the additional pain. 4 The infecting organism was subsequently identified as Proteus mirabilis. The sole of the right foot had a partially filled blister on the heel, with already established eschar formation observed over the midfoot, metatarsal heads, and the first two toes.

The infection precipitated a loss of metabolic control, leading to hyperglycemia (blood glucose levels ranging from 9-13 mmol/l) and a low-grade systemic fever (37.6°C). Despite these complications, peripheral arterial supply remained adequate, with all foot pulses exhibiting triphasic flow patterns on an 8 MHz handheld Doppler examination. 5

Medical intervention

Systemic management became the cornerstone of the patient’s care, with all other interventions carefully adjusted to prioritise achieving systemic stability. This approach necessitated hospital admission, with endocrinological support to stabilise his metabolic glucose levels, with intravenous systemic antibiotics, pain management, wound care, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) as adjunctive treatment.

The therapeutic mechanisms of HBOT at 2 ATA (Atmospheres absolute) include vasoconstriction in the healthy tissues surrounding a wounded area, facilitating a reduction in edema in the wound site. Concurrently, the therapy enhances micro-capillary blood flow, optimising oxygen delivery to the tissue. The improved microcirculation accelerates the healing process and enhances the penetration and potency of selected antibiotics. When HBOT sessions are administered in rapid succession, the synergistic effects bring quicker control over deep and surrounding wound infections. 6

The clinical team focused on stabilising the patient systemically, utilising hyperbaric oxygen to expedite recovery while maintaining a conservative approach to wound care. In-patient care was chosen to prevent walking on the feet and to avoid overwhelming the patient and his spouse physically and psychologically during the initial intensive management.7 The initial goals for managing the right foot wound were to prevent the spread of infection, stabilise blister roofs and necrotic patches with local antiseptic wound base layers, and control moisture aggressively using fluid-lock dressings to prevent bi-directional fluid exchange. Active debridement was deferred until the infection was under better control to minimise repetitive infection risk due to the patient still partially walking on the right foot, and to preserve as much plantar skin as possible.8 In contrast, the left foot, which presented with collapsed blister roofs and no significant infection markers, was managed to preserve the blister roofs as long as possible to act as a biological wound dressing. This approach provided the patient with a stable surface for mobilisation and performing activities of daily living.

Clinical progress

During his hospitalisation, the patient received five HBOT sessions over three days, with wound care procedures carried out every other day. This comprehensive and carefully coordinated approach was designed to maximise recovery while minimising the risk of further complications. Whilst hyperbaric oxygen therapy was only needed for five sessions, it had a profound impact on controlling the oedema as well as the deep and surrounding wound infection present on first admission.6 See Table 1.

 

Table 1. The impact of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) on deep and surrounding wound infection (All photos with permission of the patient)

smart table 1 - eng.png

 

On discharge home, the patient started to be fully weight-bearing on the left foot, using the right heel as a balance support. Nutrition was maintained, and his glycemic control was at a reasonable level that the patient could achieve. All further interventions were done in the wound care unit as an ambulatory patient coming from home. The timeline of progress is depicted in Table 2, with the clinical decisions of each session added for context.

 

Table 2. Timeline of wound progress for bilateral plantar burns (All photos with permission of patient)

smart table 2 - eng.png

smart table 2 cont - eng.png

Discussion

This case study conveys several important clinical messages. Firstly, not all diabetic foot wounds present as ulcers over bony prominences with the classic triad of neuropathy, ischemia, and infection.3 Secondly, neuropathy makes the feet vulnerable to more than unobserved pressure – in this case, severe thermal plantar burns.2,3 Thirdly, this case underscores the critical importance of early intervention and meticulous wound management to prevent the rapid progression of infection and associated systemic complications that occur due to comorbid diabetes.6.7 Lastly, in some cases excision and grafting of burns is not always possible or the most appropriate management strategy – especially for the plantar and palmar surfaces, the groin area, and the face due to unique skin characteristics present in those areas. These areas may benefit significantly from hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) to stabilise wound beds through hyperoxygenation and vasoconstriction, which initiates the process of repair and regeneration within injured tissue while limiting additional surrounding tissue losses. Although HBOT should ideally commence within 24 hours of a burn, even a delay of several days averted propagating sepsis and further tissue loss in this case.6 In this patient scenario, the aim was to initially secure a stable maintenance wound until the catabolic state of the wound had been reversed and the patient became optimised for healing.8 Healing could then be achieved with maximal preservation of plantar skin via contraction and epidermal and dermal invagination.

Conclusion

Plantar burns in a person with diabetes who lives in hot summer climates are not to be underestimated as a causative factor in diabetic foot morbidity.  Many are unaware of when and how the injury occurred due to longstanding sensory neuropathy. Even when blisters appear, there is a disregard for the severity in the absence of pain. Infection rapidly sets in and a potential disaster is at hand.  An interprofessional team approach is needed when plantar burn wounds involve weight-bearing parts of the foot (whether full-thickness or partial-thickness injuries). Strategies should include metabolic optimisation, preservation of non-injured plantar skin to initiate re-epithelialisation with similar skin, and the prevention of concomitant deep and surrounding wound infection as key strategies in establishing foot and lower limb safety in persons with diabetes.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding

The authors received no funding for this study.


糖尿病足足底热烧伤——患者优化和抗菌护理方法

Hiske Smart, Frans J Cronje

DOI: 10.33235/wcet.44.4.24-27

Author(s)

References

PDF

引言

所有伤口都有其背后的故事。这个故事始于阿拉伯半岛西部,涉及一位刚刚完成2024年麦加朝圣活动(Hajj)归来的患者。今年的这段时间(称为“Eid”)内,气温创下了历史新高,媒体广泛报道了高温对朝圣者发病率和死亡率的后续影响。1

这位40岁的患者有着超过10年的非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病史,在参与正午祷告时,他赤脚站在滚烫的地面上,导致右脚底部III度烧伤,另一只脚为深II度烧伤。2由于足部的神经病变造成的痛觉不敏感,身体未能提供热损伤的预警。3一天后,陪伴他的妻子发现他的双脚底部出现了充满液体的水疱Å\Å\但他仍未感觉疼痛。他按计划完成了完整的朝圣活动,随后才返回住所。为了穿鞋回家,他将水疱弄破。

患者评估

回到家后,患者的右脚在两天内出现了严重的伤口感染,促使其前往初级保健机构寻求医疗帮助。初步治疗包括口服全身抗生素和在双脚脚底涂抹外用药膏。随后,他被迅速转诊到我们的高级伤口护理与高压氧医学科,并于次日接受了评估。此时,烧伤已经持续四天,且他的右脚经历持续疼痛,根据视觉模拟量表,疼痛程度评分为4分-5分。

经初步评估,右脚表现出明显的深部伤口感染临床症状。注意到右脚与左脚及右上肢之间存在6ÅãF的温差。脚掌周缘也出现肿胀,红斑从脚趾基底部一直延伸到脚掌中部,并有恶臭的渗出液Å\Å\这些是深部伤口感染并伴有额外疼痛的明确指标。4随后经鉴别,感染病菌为奇异变形杆菌。右脚脚跟处有一个部分充盈的水疱,脚掌中部、跖骨头和前两个脚趾已观察到形成的焦痂。

加剧的感染导致代谢失控,引起高血糖症(血糖水平在9 mmol/l-13 mmol/l之间),并出现全身低烧(37.6ÅãC)。尽管出现了这些并发症,但外周动脉供血仍保持充足,手持8 MHz多普勒超声检查显示,所有足脉搏均呈现三相流模式。5

医疗干预

系统管理成为患者护理的核心,所有其他干预措施都经过精心调整,以优先实现系统稳定。采用这种方法后,他必须入院接受内分泌治疗,以稳定代谢葡萄糖水平,同时静脉注射全身性抗生素、疼痛管理、伤口护理和高压氧疗(HBOT)作为辅助治疗。

2 ATA(绝对大气压)的HBOT治疗机制包括收缩伤口周围健康组织的血管,从而减轻伤口部位的水肿。同时,该疗法还能増强微毛细血管的血流量,优化组织的氧气输送。微循环的改善加快了愈合过程,并増强了特定抗生素的渗透力和效力。如果快速连续地进行HBOT治疗,其协同效应能更快地控制伤口深部和周围的感染。6

临床团队的工作重点是稳定患者的全身状况,利用高压氧加快恢复,同时维持保守的伤口护理方法。选择住院治疗,是为了防止步行,并避免在初期强化管理期间给患者及其配偶带来过大的身体和心理负担。7管理右脚伤口的最初目标是防止感染扩散,用局部抗菌伤口基底层稳定水疱顶部和坏死斑块,并积极控制湿度,使用锁水敷料防止双向液体交换。由于患者右脚仍有部分行走功能,为了最大限度地降低重复感染的风险,并尽可能多地保留足底皮肤,在感染得到较好控制之前,推迟了活动性清创术。8相比之下,左脚的水疱顶部塌陷,但没有明显的感染指标,因此在处理时尽可能保留水疱顶部,作为生物伤口敷料。这种方法为患者提供了一个稳定的表面,方便其活动和进行日常生活活动。

临床进展

住院治疗期间,患者在三天内接受了五个疗程的HBOT治疗,并每隔一天进行一次伤口护理。这种全面而精心协调的方法旨在最大限度地促进康复,同时将进一步出现并发症的风险降至最低。虽然高压氧疗只需要五个疗程,但对控制首次入院时存在的水肿和深部及周围伤口感染产生了深远影响。6参见表1。

 

表1.高压氧疗(HBOT)对深部和周围伤口感染的影响(所有照片均经患者许可)

smart table 1 - cn.png

 

出院回家后,患者开始完全用左脚负重,用右脚跟作为平衡支撑。营养得以维持,患者的血糖控制也达到了一个合理水平。后续所有干预措施均在伤口护理病房,将其作为门诊患者进行。表2列出了进展的时间表,并添加了每个疗程的临床决策作为背景资料。

 

表2.双侧足底烧伤伤口进展时间表(所有照片均经患者许可)

smart table 2 - cn.png

表2.双侧足底烧伤伤口进展时间表(续)(所有照片均经患者许可)

smart 2.2-cn.png

 

讨论

本病例研究传达了几项重要的临床信息。首先,并非所有糖尿病足伤口都表现为骨突处的溃疡,并伴有典型三联征,即神经病变、缺血和感染。3其次,神经病变使足部不仅易受未察觉的压力影响Å\Å\在本病例中,足底严重热烧伤。2,3第三,本病例强调了早期干预和精细伤口管理的极端重要性,以防止因合并糖尿病而导致的感染和相关全身并发症的快速发展。6.7最后,在某些情况下,烧伤切除和植皮并不总是可行或最合适的治疗策略,尤其是在足底和掌面、腹股沟区域以及面部,因为这些区域的皮肤具有独特的特征。高压氧疗(HBOT)可通过高氧和血管收缩稳定伤口床,启动受伤组织的修复和再生过程,同时限制周围组织的额外损失,从而使这些区域从治疗中获益。尽管理想情况下应在烧伤后24小时内开始HBOT,但在本案例中,即使延迟数天也能避免脓毒症的传播和进一步的组织损失。6在此患者的情况下,最初的目标是确保伤口的稳定维持,直至伤口的分解代谢状态得到逆转,患者优化到可愈合的状态。8随后,通过收缩、表皮和真皮内陷最大限度地保留足底皮肤,达到愈合目的。

结论

生活在夏季炎热气候中的糖尿病患者足底烧伤是糖尿病足发病率的一个致病因素,不容小觑。由于长期的感觉神经病变,无法察觉损伤的发生时间和原因。即使出现了水疱,由于没有疼痛感,患者往往会忽视其严重性。感染迅速蔓延,潜在的灾难就在眼前。当足底烧伤涉及足部负重部位时(无论是全层还是部分厚度损伤),都需要采用跨学科团队协作方法。作为确保糖尿病患者足部和下肢安全的关键策略,应包括以下措施:优化代谢状态、保留未受伤的足底皮肤以启动类似皮肤的再上皮化,以及预防同时发生的深层和周围伤口感染。

利益冲突声明

作者声明无利益冲突。

资助

作者未因该项研究收到任何资助。


Author(s)

Hiske Smart*
RN MA(Nur) HonsBSocSc(Nur) PGDip WHTR(UK) IIWCC(Can)
Advanced Nurse Practitioner: Clinical Wound Specialist Services,
King Hamad American Mission Hospital, Kingdom of Bahrain

Frans J Cronje
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Consultant, Baromedicine Unit,
King Hamad American Mission Hospital, Kingdom of Bahrain

* Corresponding author

References

  1. Associated Press. Death toll at Hajj pilgrimage tops 1,300 amid scorching temperatures. Voice of America, June 23, 2024, 3:58 PM. https://www.voanews.com/a/over-1-000-pilgrims-died-during-this-year-s-hajj-pilgrimage-in-saudi-arabia-officials-say-/7666904.html (accessed 14-08-2024)
  2. Markiewicz-Gospodarek A, Kozioł M, Tobiasz M, Baj J, Radzikowska-Büchner E, Przekora A. Burn Wound Healing: Clinical Complications, Medical Care, Treatment, and Dressing Types: The Current State of Knowledge for Clinical Practice. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 25;19(3):1338. Doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031338. PMID: 35162360; PMCID: PMC8834952.
  3. Rehman ZU, Khan J, Noordin S. Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Contemporary Assessment And Management. J Pak Med Assoc. 2023;73(7):1480-1487. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.6634. PMID: 37469062.
  4. Woo KY, Sibbald RG. A cross-sectional validation study of using NERDS and STONEES to assess bacterial burden. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2009;55(8):40-8. PMID: 19717855.
  5. Alavi A, Sibbald RG, Nabavizadeh R, Valaei F, Coutts P, Mayer D. Audible handheld Doppler ultrasound determines reliable and inexpensive exclusion of significant peripheral arterial disease. Vascular. 2015;23(6):622-9. doi: 10.1177/1708538114568703. Epub 2015 Jan 27. PMID: 25628222.
  6. Weitgasser L, Ihra G, Schäfer B, Markstaller K, Radtke C. Update on hyperbaric oxygen therapy in burn treatment. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2021;133(3-4):137-143. doi: 10.1007/s00508-019-01569-w. Epub 2019 Nov 7. PMID: 31701218.
  7. Sibbald RG, Goodman L, Woo KY, Krasner DL, Smart H, Tariq G, Ayello EA, Burrell RE, Keast DH, Mayer D, Norton L, Salcido RS. Special considerations in wound bed preparation 2011: an update©. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2011;24(9):415-36; quiz 437-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000405216.27050.97. PMID: 21860264.
  8. Boersema GC, Smart H, Giaquinto-Cilliers MGC, Mulder M, Weir GR, Bruwer FA, Idensohn PJ, Sander JE, Stavast A, Swart M, Thiart S, Van der Merwe Z. Management of Nonhealable and Maintenance Wounds: A Systematic Integrative Review and Referral Pathway. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2021;34(1):11-22. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000722740.93179.9f. PMID: 33323798.